Posted 12 January 2012
In an email dated 17 November 2011, a third party, Prof Roy Jobson, submitted that the respondent’s product is currently still being promoted on several website pages belonging to the respondent. Prof Jobson specifically supplied the relevant URL’s to support his contention that the respondent is in breach of the previous rulings.
He submitted, inter alia, that the respondent is a repeat offender and should have ensured that all these promotions of Neuroforce were removed from its website many months ago. The complainant further requested that the most severe sanctions possible be imposed on the respondent.