Posted 29 March 2015
Reproduced from Medical Brief
Fat Blocker moves to silence fact checker
Published: 23 March 2015
“MedicalBrief is Africa’s authoritative weekly digest of medical matters, both on the continent and around the world. It brings you a succinct summary of the latest developments, both in news and research, with links to the original material.”
Dr Harris Steinman, a medical doctor and consumer activist who runs a South African website exposing misleading claims about health products, has been forced to move his site offshore after sports supplement company USN demanded his internet service provider (ISP) take down his site because it was ‘unlawful’. Steinman has long been a thorn in the flesh of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) manufacturers because of his success in using the Advertising Standards Authority to remove or change misleading advertising and in this instance his criticisms relate to a USN product called ‘Fat Blocker’.
Continue reading at MedicalBrief
[in the event MedicalBrief is not accessible, the article continues below]
IT specialist Kevin Charleston says that this is the latest tactic by CAM manufacturers to silence critics. They also were using intimidatory and expensive suits (so called SLAPP suits) to intimidate.
It is previously reported by West Cape News that in 2013 USN fell foul of tests conducted by D Steinman, which showed that one of their products, USN 100% Whey Protein, did not contain the protein percentage claimed. Discovery Health Professor of Exercise and Sports Science at the University of Cape Town, Tim Noakes, said the difference in protein amount — 17% — would not have notable effect for athletes.
This, said Noakes, was because the product is “not working anyway”, the 17 percent difference was “17 percent of nothing”.
GroundUp reports that Steinman has lodged numerous complaints about medicine advertisements with the Advertising Standards Authority, most of which have been upheld. Steinman wrote the first post regarding USN, after complaints about a USN product called “Fat Blocker”.
Until last Friday CAMcheck was hosted on Hetzner, one of the largest internet hosting companies in the country. But on 10 March Hetzner told Steinman that if he did not change content critical of sports supplement company USN within five days, his site would be taken down.
USN had lodged a take-down notice request with the Internet Service Providers’ Association (ISPA), of which Hetzner is a member. Anyone who considers material on a website to be unlawful can request the ISP to take it down.
USN referred to three posts in its request, in which Steinman accuses USN of selling products under false pretences with no factual evidence to support its claims, and calls USN CEO Albe Geldenhuys a “liar” and “a scam artist.”
Steinman wrote the first post after complaints about a USN product called “Fat Blocker”.
Following a ruling by the Advertising Standards Authority(ASA) that Steinman placed on his website. Steinman says that USN later changed the product name. He wrote a new post saying the new product had the same ingredients as *Fat Blocker. “I wrote the blog about how angry I was that Geldenhuys made a massive empire on products with no evidence to back it up.”
A year later, according to Steinman, a cycling website picked up his first post and it went viral.
“This is why I think USN then had to react,” Steinman said.
In a press statement on 23 January this year, Geldenhuys rejected Steinman’s claims, calling them “unsubstantiated and defamatory.” He said USN products were regularly tested.
Steinman responded to USN’s press statement with a third post where he referred to Geldenhuys as a “scam artist”, among other things.
In response to questions sent by GroundUp, USN national marketing coordinator Gareth Powell said the articles written on CAMcheck were a threat to the integrity of the brand and to that of Geldenhuys as an individual. “The article in question went viral on social media. This meant that the article was being viewed by many of our existing and potential customers. As such, the decision was made to take action. However, our concern was never regarding the possibility of an impact on sales, but rather the insufficient and un-factual information contained in the article, which sought to discredit the USN brand and our CEO, Albe Geldenhuys, in his personal capacity,” he said.
Powell said USN was still considering legal action. “The take down notice issued by USN to the author is not an attack on freedom of speech. In this case, the personal opinions of the author need to be separated from the facts,” he said. Powell added that USN would respond to the allegations made by Steinman “at an appropriate time”.
Hetzner Communications Manager Athena Turner said the company was legally obliged to act on all take-down notice requests. “Once we receive a take-down notice request from ISPA, Hetzner checks whether the request is valid by checking that the content referred to in the notification does appear on the website and that the website is hosted on our network.
In another article, investigatory magazine Noseweek highlights ‘the persistent efforts of medical doctor and researcher Harris Steinman to make sure that the weak and vulnerable aren’t taken for a ride by snake oil salesmen’.
‘Steinman concluded a long time ago that, because of the weak regulatory system in the area of complementary and alternative medicines (“CAMs”), his best bet was the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA)…. The ASA Code of Practice says that an advertiser must be honest, and must not make claims that are misleading. It also says that if an advertisement makes claims that are objectively verifiable, the advertiser must be in possession of documentary evidence that supports those claims, and that documentation must come from someone who is “independent, credible and an expert in the particular field”. Steinman lodges a lot of ASA objections and his win-rate is pretty good. ‘
(Link opens in new browser window)
- Can You Get Too Much Protein? 15 September, 2021
- SLAPPing back: Court checks corporate bullying 12 February, 2021
- Sports nutrition position paper backs dietary protein over supplements 28 August, 2020
- South African Whey and Casein protein powders lack important amino acids 7 November, 2019
- USN PhedraCut Lipo XT recalled due to high caffeine content 18 September, 2019
- UK ASA rules claims of USN Phedracut breach advertising code 6 August, 2019
- Sports nutrition: spoiled by ‘wrong and immoral’ marketing 10 May, 2018
- Protein World’s Carb Blocker versus USN Carb Block 22 March, 2018
- 5 supplements that claim to speed up weight loss – and what the science says 31 January, 2018
- Why do teenagers use supplements, and where do they get their advice? 27 November, 2017
- 3 Bodybuilding Supplements That Are An Absolute Waste Of Money 16 October, 2017
- Denmark warns over online sports supplements 2 July, 2017
- Sports nutrition growth spoiled by ‘wrong and immoral’ marketing 28 June, 2017
- Sports supplements sold to children 12 May, 2017
- Garcinia Linked to Liver Damage 1 May, 2017
- Teens Receiving Inaccurate Information on Supplements 19 April, 2017
- Court strikes blow against quackery 17 March, 2017
- Some good reasons to be cautious about using dietary supplements 13 February, 2017
- Protein hype: shoppers flushing money down the toilet, say experts 28 December, 2016
- Muscle-building shakes don’t always have as much protein as they claim to 11 July, 2016
- Targeting school children in marketing campaigns for sports supplements: Is it ethical? 31 May, 2016
- USN linked to company promoting sport supplements in children 21 April, 2016
- Diet supplements threat to liver 25 January, 2016
- Power Report: Watchdog in chains as advertiser fights back 18 November, 2015
- USN’s defamation action: Commentary on RSG 21 October, 2015
- Supplement use might be a sign of disordered eating in men 8 October, 2015
- Die Burger: Aktivis gedagvaar oor aanvullers 7 October, 2015
- USN, Herbex, Antagolin, Solal and Vigro (Nativa) go to court to block ASA 6 October, 2015
- USN: Previous ASA rulings 5 October, 2015
- USN defamation charge against CamCheck 17 September, 2015
- Do sports drinks and energy bars make you a better athlete? 15 September, 2015
- CLA supplement linked to hepatitis case 14 September, 2015
- USN/Evox Protein supplements: what you need to know 26 August, 2015
- Melamine contamination in South African nutritional supplements 21 July, 2015
- USN Carb Binder – ASA breach ruling 7 May, 2015
- Nutritech Diet Meal vs USN – ASA Ruling 5 May, 2015
- Nutritech Premium Pure Whey Lite vs USN – ASA Ruling 4 May, 2015
- Muscle-Building Supplements Linked to Testicular Cancer 22 April, 2015
- Study finds troubling link between use of muscle-building supplements and cancer 14 April, 2015
- MedicalBrief: Fat Blocker moves to silence fact checker 29 March, 2015
- UK ASA acts against USN product claims 26 March, 2015
- New consumer site casts doubt on (USN) supplement claims 24 March, 2015
- USN issues a ‘Take-down’ notice for CamCheck 18 March, 2015
- USN CreatineX4 – UK ruling 18 March, 2015
- USN ‘Carb binder’ – the scam continues 10 February, 2015
- White kidney bean extract for weight loss? 29 January, 2015
- Albe Geldenhuys / USN responds to CamCheck posting 26 January, 2015
- Oxygen myths that refuse to die 18 November, 2014
- USN 100% Whey Protein 13 October, 2014
- USN Fat Block – Fat chance 3 October, 2014
- USN Phedra-Cut Lipo XT – ASA breach ruling 2 October, 2014
- Anti-Doping Agency warns athletes about dietary supplements 11 August, 2014
- USN 19-Testo Mass – ASA ruling 28 July, 2014
- USN “Carb Binder” – scam product, ASA ruling 28 July, 2014
- USN 19 TESTO MASS – ASA ruling 9 May, 2014
- Albe Geldenhuys of USN, a master scam artist? 9 March, 2014
- Biogen Tribulus – ASA Santions – 31 January 2014 31 January, 2014
- Biogen Testoforte: ASA ruling – website advert 10 November, 2013
- Biogen Testoforte: ASA ruling – print advert 10 November, 2013
- Biogen Tribulus – ASA Breach ruling – 8 November 2013 8 November, 2013
- USN Pure Protein Bar – ASA ruling 10 October, 2013
- Biogen Tribulus – ASA ruling – 11 September 2013 11 September, 2013
- USN Phedra-Cut Hardcore – ASA Ruling 10 June, 2013
- USN Fat Block – Lie, no proof that it blocks fat 7 May, 2013
- USN Phedra-Cut LipoXT product – ASA ruling 7 April, 2013
- USN Weight loss product’s claims are ‘misleading’ 4 February, 2013
- USN Phedra-Cut Hardcore – No proof! 17 January, 2013
- USN Phedra-Cut Lipo XT – ASA ruling 1 August, 2012
- Biogen Andrenal Boost nonsense 12 August, 2011
- Protein supplements give no benefit to athlete’s performance 10 July, 2011
- USN Cellu-Firm – ASA Sanctions – 15 July 2009 15 July, 2009
- USN Cellu-Firm – ASA Breach ruling – 8 June 2009 8 June, 2009
- USN Cellu-Firm – ASA Sanctions – 16 October 2008 16 October, 2008
- USN Cellu-Firm – ASA Breach ruling – 8 April 2008 8 April, 2008
- USN Cellu-Firm – ASA breach ruling – 02 April 2007 2 April, 2007
- USN Cellu-Firm – ASA ruling November 2006 28 November, 2006