Categories

Antagolin – Still no robust evidence II

Posted 07 August 2014

The ASA has previously ruled against the claims for Antagolin. The company submitted new evidence in support of their claims. The ASA requested the two previous complainants to comment on the submission. Based on the ASA’s assessment of the complaint, and the comments, they ruled against the claims for Antagolin.

Importantly, Dr Conrad Smith and pharmacist, Mariaan du Plessis, may have opened themselves to being struck of the professional register for conducting a study without ethical approval or informed consent.

Ruling 2

[divider]

Antagolin / SJ Goldstein / 22891
Ruling of the : ASA Directorate
In the matter between:
Dr SJ Goldstein Complainant(s)/Appellant(s)
Medical Nutritional Institute (Pty) Ltd Respondent

25 Jul 2014

http://www.asasa.org.za/ResultDetail.aspx?Ruling=6920

BACKGROUND

In a ruling dated 28 February 2014, in accepting the respondent’s undertaking to withdraw its commercial containing claims that were complained against, the ASA Directorate, stated:

“ …the claim that “Antagolin combats … Read the rest

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  

  

  

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.