Posted 13 April 2010
The claims are based on one study only – a study by Nelson et al* and not published or peer reviewed but presented at a congress. Those wishing to make money from this expensive blood test reference this test as proof that the diet works and has been proven.
What was the concluding point made by Nelson and colleagues? They are quoted as saying: “The researchers said their findings were preliminary, and need much more confirmation before they could be used commercially“. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8550091.stm
We feel the claims are premature . . .
… Read the rest