Posted 11 April 2014
Make no mistake, the evidence for Antagolin being an effective weight loss / insulin resistance treatment is not robust at all. There is no study published on this product, no evidence that the ingredients are effective, and now, the products is actually an illegal medicine for CAM regulations published will not permit it as a CAM, and it is not registered as a medicine.
Read this ASA ruling with our deconstruction to see why we call this product a scam.
Continue reading: Antagolin – ASA ruling
Posted 11 April 2014
According to the company, the Rayma Balance Bracelet will not longer be sold in South Africa! However, can we believe Mr Mervyn Daitz of Topline Innovations? This is not the only scam he has been responsible for. Continue reading: Rayma Balance Bracelet removed from SA
Posted 01 April 2014
The claims for Aminoliq has previously been ruled against by the ASA for the company could not prove that the product could really do as claimed. Despite an assurance from the owner, Norman Fells, that he would no longer make the claims, the company has recently produced a number of variants and started making unsubstantiated claims again. Can one not trust Norman Fells? Worse, Norman is treasurer of the HPA (Health Products Association of South Africa). Oops!!
Continue reading: Aminoliq – still no evidence it works
Posted 30 March 2014
This is an old ASA ruling. Erex is a product that claims to assist men by making them “Hard and healthy …naturally” and to benefit and “boost your sex life…”. A complaint was laid with the ASA in 2007 against these claims and Erex were not able to prove that they are possible, yet Dischem still continues to sell this product today. Now that is a long life for a scam!
Continue reading: Erex – ASA ruling
Posted 25 March 2015
Jasmine and Chris Grindlay of Slimbetti have been promoting their Hoodia Gel scam product in South Africa and simply ignoring ASA rulings. Other countries have had similar problems although in many this scam has disappeared off the market.
I have recently come across this article titled “The Controversial Advertising case: Weight-Loss Product— Hoodia” - ”Marketing advertising and public policy” published December 19, 2011.
The article makes the point:
“Hoodia was one of the weight loss products that was advertised as a natural and effective remedy by Nutraceuticals International and Stella Labs. Nutraceuticals International and Stella Labs are the suppliers of the ingredient Hoodia gordonii (hoodia), and they claim that consumers are able to lose weight and suppress appetites by using hoodia, which is found in Southern Africa. However, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), as a significant regulatory agency in preventing unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the marketplace for the protection of consumers, charged both companies with false and deceptive advertising in violation of Section 5 and 12 of the FTC Act.”
Continue reading: Weight-Loss Products – Hoodia
Posted 25 March 2014
This research article, titled “The portrayal of slimness through design : an analysis of a misleading weight loss advertisement : research article” written by Rudi De Lange, Tshwane University of Technology, was published in the South African Journal of Art History (2013;28(2):72-84.
The abstract reads:
The portrayal of the ultra-thin ideal model in the media contributes to body discontent amongst some viewers of the intended target groups. This in its turn may lead to excessive weight concerns and so create a vulnerable group that is primed for commercial exploitation. Advertising designers exploit this vulnerable population through the use of visceral imagery and text in misleading weight loss advertisements in order to better market their products. The ultra-thin models used in weight loss advertisements act as strong emotional cues and enable advertisers to influence even wary consumers to respond to these cues. This case study analysis of a weight loss advertisement highlights and illustrates how designers proceeded to create an elusive promise of slimness by misrepresenting scientific data and employed misleading textual and graphic cues in order to create an effective but nonetheless misleading advertisement.
Posted 24 March 2014
This UK article (March 20, 2014) reports on Live Blood Analysis quack Errol Denton who was handed a £19,000* court bill.
The Ilford Recorder reported:
Denton, who did not attend court and was not represented, was ordered to pay a total of £19,101 in fines and prosecution costs at Westminster Magistrates Court.
He was found guilty of nine offences after a trial, a rare prosecution under The Cancer Act 1939, which prohibits advertisements offering to treat or to cure cancer.
Errol Denton also featured prominently in the UK ASA ruling: “ASA Adjudication on Live Blood Test”
CamCheck posts related to Live Blood Analysis
Posted 13 March 2014
Edzard Ernst is professor of complementary medicine at the Peninsula medical school at the universities of Exeter and Plymouth. In this article published in The Guardian in 2005, Prof Ernst points out that the claims are nonsense, i.e., this test is no more than a scam. In fact, this is not new – the claims being made for this test in 2014 were rubbished as far back as 1980s!
Continue reading: Live Blood Analysis? It doesn’t work
Posted 9 March 2014
||USN was founded in South Africa by Albe Geldenhuys.
Meet a great salesman – and also one of South Africa’s biggest scam artists.
Why are we making such a bold claim?
Continue reading: Albe Geldenhuys of USN, a master scam artist
Posted 07 March 2014
Dr Goldstein lodged a consumer complaint against a Medical Nutritional Institute’s television commercial promoting Antagolin. The commercial features a very overweight female in underwear, stating “I don’t want to look like this anymore. What is happening to my body? Why can’t I lose weight?” A male voice-over the states “You may be suffering from insulin resistance. Measure your waist. Females measuring more than 88cm may have insulin resistance. Antagolin combats insulin resistance and will help you to lose weight effectively. Antagolin, developed by the Medical Nutritional Institute”.
The complainant submitted, in essence, that there is no evidence that the product with its ingredient mix has any benefits as made in the claims. She explained that the ingredients listed for the product have been scarcely researched, and are potentially toxic. The dosage used in the product is also well below what was researched.
The Medical Nutritional Institute’s “experts” were not able to supply any proof that the product works, and the ASA ruled against the claims. Readers may be aware from my previous posting, that I has shared the data with you why the claims for this product appear to be bogus. And the “experts” behind this scam? Dr Conrad Smith and the pharmacist Mariaan du Plessis.
Read DietDoc’s similar conclusions on Health24
Continue reading: Antagolin, ASA agrees, no evidence it works!